A widening gap between safe innovation and fast-paced AI development is emerging in Australia, placing business leaders in opposition to community values. Research funded by a philanthropic organisation shows that a majority of Australians support tighter control over artificial intelligence, even if it means missing out on productivity gains the government estimates could reach $600 billion each year by 2030.
Currently, Australia's AI future is being discussed from many perspectives. On one side, a technology-focused think tank is advocating for less restrictive copyright laws to allow developers to train AI systems using creative content. On the other side, a foundation known for its work in social justice is warning that this could damage public trust, particularly around areas like safety, intellectual property and data privacy.
Central to this dispute is research that surveyed 2000 adult Australians and included six focus groups to understand public attitudes towards AI regulation. The findings reveal that 61% support a model that fosters innovation while clearly protecting individuals. However, if that balance cannot be achieved, 64% would prefer tight restrictions even if it means AI progress slows. This suggests that public opposition is not to AI itself but to development that is unregulated and lacks transparency.
At the same time, technology advocates argue that Australia's outdated copyright laws threaten global competitiveness. A separate report from a tech council found that nearly half of Australians believe the government does not have the necessary expertise to shape effective AI policy. These groups are pushing for more flexible and well-informed rules that enable local AI innovation and preserve international standing. They worry that inaction or uncertainty may lead to valuable opportunities moving overseas.
This reflects a deeper question about how much control people are willing to give up for innovation. Many are already using AI in the workplace, with research showing around 84% of office workers rely on it in some way. However, concerns remain. Australians want fair use, control over their personal data and clarity about how AI is being created and applied. Whether public opinion or business interests will ultimately influence policy is still unknown, but the debate is clearly intensifying.
