Australia’s union movement is pushing for AI regulation at the upcoming national productivity summit. While companies are adopting AI to boost efficiency, unions are concerned that rapid automation could lead to job losses and greater inequality. The main debate is how quickly organisations should introduce AI in areas like customer service and administration. These changes may lower costs but also threaten many middle-class jobs.
AI use in Australia gained momentum after a major bank began using it in call centres, showing how technology could improve productivity across the private sector. The Productivity Commission supports this direction and sees AI as a powerful tool for efficiency in both private and public organisations. Unions warn that the pace of change could harm white-collar workers whose roles are vulnerable to automation.
Unions want new legal controls to shape how AI is used, particularly in major industries such as banking. The Australian Council of Trade Unions is expected to lead discussions at the summit. It plans to push for rules designed to protect workers and prevent widespread job displacement. While businesses are advocating for flexibility, unions hold significant influence with the government, giving their proposals added weight.
In the background, large companies and consulting firms are moving quickly. They aim to cut costs by using AI in departments like HR, call centres and research. Many workers in generalist jobs, especially those working remotely, fear being replaced if they do not have specialised skills.
Potential laws could slow the rollout of AI, but overall implementation is unlikely to stop. Beyond labour concerns, there are wider issues over infrastructure. Data centres that support AI consume large amounts of energy and water. These facilities add strain to national resources and have sparked criticism. Some argue that subsidies offered to keep these centres competitive may divert funds from vital public services.
Unions are also likely to raise environmental concerns. Current data centres rely on energy-intensive technology and use significant water resources, leading to sustainability challenges. In the United States, water usage by data centres has led to public backlash. Similar concerns may grow in Australia as climate issues become more urgent.
Within government, unions believe that AI could reduce costs further. However, they also fear that this could lead to major cuts in public sector employment. With the federal government unlikely to oppose union demands, any rollout of AI in public services is expected to come with conditions.
Internationally, investors continue to back AI-driven companies. But in Australia, strong union influence may result in stricter regulation. This could slow progress in sectors such as banking and technology, setting the country on a more cautious path.
Sources:
